Skip to content

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

Home / UK housing & migration / Right to Buy is shocking value for money – a sensible government would ditch it
UK housing & migration

Right to Buy is shocking value for money – a sensible government would ditch it

John Perry May 20, 2019

Right to Buy continues to fiercely divide opinion. Here, John Perry argues why he believes calling time on the 40-year-old policy is now the sensible thing to do

Here’s a good question for a pub quiz: what was Britain’s biggest ever privatisation? Was it British Gas, or perhaps water or electricity? All of these raised more than £5bn each but neither was the biggest. Perhaps, surprisingly, the answer can be found in table 60 of the annual UK Housing Review. The correct answer is, of course, the Right to Buy, which has so far raised over £55bn across England, Wales and Scotland and dwarfs all of the other privatisations.

In fact, adding the sales of all the privatised companies together produces a figure – £60bn – which is only slightly higher than the earnings from the Right to Buy. It seems extraordinary that when the popularity of privatisation has ebbed and the opposition is talking about renationalisation of the rail network and water, that Right to Buy not only survived but has been reinvigorated. It only continues in England, of course – in Scotland it ended in 2016, after more than 35 years, and in Wales it ended in January. Even in Northern Ireland, where Right to Buy is called the House Sales Scheme, a consultation began last year in which scrapping the scheme is the favoured option.

In the meantime, the evidence against keeping the Right to Buy in England piles up. Different surveys have confirmed that of the houses sold, some 40% end up in the private rented sector, where the rents charged are usually far higher than the original council rents. There are regular reports of convictions for Right to Buy fraud. Councils are having to buy houses back at inflated prices to house homeless families. And despite government promises, sales still far exceed the numbers of homes built or purchased to replace them. In 2018, there were almost 11,000 sales by English councils but fewer than 5,000 replacements.

Right to Buy is also shocking value for money. The average receipt in England since the scheme began is only £25,000 per property (currently it’s about £83,000). The average discount, which fell sharply in the mid-2000s, has been running at over £60,000 per property since the policy was reinvigorated in 2012 and is typically more than 40% of the market value.The injustice of better-off tenants receiving such a huge lump sum subsidy while poorer households wait in vain for an allocation has never been more obvious.

Meanwhile, the proceeds of Right to Buy continue to grow by over £1bn per year, with much of the money going to the Treasury rather than being reinvested in new homes. While calls to recycle more of the cash into housing investment are understandable, they detract from the main aim which should be to persuade the government that it’s time to suspend the Right to Buy.After all, when politicians in Wales and Scotland decided to act, and suggested doing so in Northern Ireland, there were few political ructions.

By April last year in England, Right to Buy had led to 1,983,213 homes being sold since the scheme began in 1980. Sales by councils – and by housing associations under the ‘preserved’ Right to Buy – continue to run at around 16,000 per year in total. This means that very soon – perhaps while you are reading this article – the two millionth English council house will have been sold.

Surely, a sensible government could, if it wanted to, proudly point to the number of new homeowners the scheme has created over almost four decades and then quietly say “that’s enough”?

Original post and comments: Inside Housing

Post Tags: #council housing#right to rent

Post navigation

Previous Previous
Latin America is still the empire’s workshop
NextContinue
‘Unreported World’ and the misreporting of Nicaragua

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to the Two Worlds blog and we'll send you an email alert when we publish a new post. Please review our Privacy Policy if you have any questions or concerns.

Check your inbox now to confirm your subscription.

Categories

  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • Masaya project updates
  • Energy and the environment
  • Central America wildlife
  • Book reviews
  • Obituaries

Tags

allocations ALMOs Argentina borrowing rules budget butterflies census climate change Colombia community cohesion Costa Rica council housing Cuba drugs energy efficiency environment Green Deal homelessness Honduras housing housing benefit housing finance housing investment housing policy investment Latin writers Malvinas Masaya media Mexico migration migration policy migration statistics model cities Nicaragua Paraguay pension funds private rented sector rents right to buy tenancy reform tenant involvement transport US intervention welfare reform

Blogroll

  • Articles for Antiwar.com
  • Articles for Black Agenda Report
  • Articles for Counterpunch
  • Articles for Covert Action Magazine
  • Articles for Global Research
  • Articles for LA Progressive
  • Articles for Monthly Review online
  • Articles for NACLA
  • Articles for The Grayzone
  • Articles for The Guardian
  • Articles in People's Dispatch
  • Blogs for Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Blogs for Open Democracy
  • Blogs for the London Review of Books
  • Posts for Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
  • Posts in Sheerpost
  • Two Worlds on Substack

Related websites

  • Chartered Institute of Housing
  • Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Housing Rights
  • Nicaragua Solidarity Coalition
  • UK Housing Review
Housing Guardian contributor
John PerryJohn Perry lives in Masaya, Nicaragua where he writes about Latin America for the Grayzone, Covert Action, FAIR, London Review of Books, Morning Star and elsewhere, and also works on UK housing and migration issues.

Copyright © 2012-2025 Two Worlds | Privacy & Cookie Policy

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact
Search