Skip to content

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

Home / Latin America / Drugs policies don’t work
Latin America

Drugs policies don’t work

July 2, 2012February 20, 2013

Latin America’s political leaders are beginning to realise that the drugs ‘war’ is unwinnable and diverts enormous resources to a task that would be pointless if consumption were regulated like tobacco or alcohol.

Michael Ware’s thought-provoking piece about drugs policy struck a chord with Public Finance’s only resident blogger in Central America. This is a region that is very much a victim of drug trafficking and where Michael would find his views reflected in high-level political comment.

Earlier this year the new president of Guatemala who – shall we say – is no trendy lefty, used a feature article in The Observer to express his frustration with current policy on drugs, its futility and the devastating effects on his and other countries.  His views have been echoed or received sympathetically in several parts of Latin America, which is of course not only one of the main sources of illegal drugs but involves many countries that aren’t producers nevertheless having to cope with drug trafficking.

For example, the small country of Honduras now has one of the highest murder rates in the world, in part because it is a key staging point on the drugs route.  This has led the US Drug Enforcement Administration to mount assaults on isolated communities there to detain drug traffickers. In May this resulted in the deaths of four innocent people, including two pregnant women.

Neither the US nor the Honduran government has paid much attention and nor have they offered help to the victims’ families. Imagine the reaction if foreign security forces had helicoptered into Texas and shot four people.

Quite apart from the deaths (at least 54,000 in Mexico alone, as Michael said) the illegal trade has a devastating effect on people’s lives.  It has to be remembered that cocaine (for example) is almost worthless in itself, only achieving extortionate values on the streets of the United States or Europe.  It is shipped in huge quantities – hundreds of kilograms – by all manner of means.  That only a proportion of what is sent arrives at the point of sale is all part of the business and makes little difference to the drug cartels’ earnings.

But it leaves a trail of damage behind it.  I have watched as a lorry carrying enormous piles of bananas in Nicaragua was patiently unloaded by police to reveal dozens of packages of cocaine, each the size of a ream of paper.  No one was killed in the incident, but lives were ruined by it.  The lorry driver, who did the job as his one chance of earning a significant amount of money, was condemned to years in jail and his lorry was confiscated.

Whether the collateral damage from the ‘war on drugs’ is murdered women bystanders in Honduras or imprisoned breadwinners in Nicaragua, families are being destroyed and neither the drug cartels nor the enormous drug enforcement industry does anything to mitigate the damage.

And those who pay least attention are the users themselves.  It’s curious that there can be a degree of consumer awareness about the wages received by the Chinese workers who assemble iPads, whereas concern about the misery caused by drugs focuses on its effects on the users themselves and on their neighbours, not on the countries through which their drugs have passed.

One factor that Michael didn’t mention is that the cartels and the enforcers actually want drugs to be illegal.  This is what forces up their price, keeps out legitimate potential suppliers and requires enormous government expenditure on weaponry to fight the drugs war.

Political leaders in Latin America are beginning to realise not only that the ‘war’ is unwinnable and hence futile, but it is diverting enormous resources to a task that would be pointless if drug consumption either ceased or was regulated, like tobacco or alcohol.  Given that attempts to get people – many of whom should know better – to stop taking drugs don’t work, a regulated market looks a much better bet.

It could hardly be worse than the current situation. Pretending otherwise is yet another instance of rich countries not only exploiting poorer ones but blaming them for supplying a commodity whose market price is determined in New York or London, just like coffee or cocoa.

Original post and comments: Public Finance

Post Tags: #Honduras#Nicaragua#drugs

Post navigation

Previous Previous
Honduras, three years on
NextContinue
How can housing help migrants integrate into communities?

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to the Two Worlds blog and we'll send you an email alert when we publish a new post. Please review our Privacy Policy if you have any questions or concerns.

Check your inbox now to confirm your subscription.

Categories

  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • Masaya project updates
  • Energy and the environment
  • Central America wildlife
  • Book reviews
  • Obituaries

Tags

allocations ALMOs Argentina borrowing rules budget butterflies census climate change Colombia community cohesion Costa Rica council housing Cuba drugs energy efficiency environment Green Deal homelessness Honduras housing housing benefit housing finance housing investment housing policy investment Latin writers Malvinas Masaya media Mexico migration migration policy migration statistics model cities Nicaragua Paraguay pension funds private rented sector rents right to buy tenancy reform tenant involvement transport US intervention welfare reform

Blogroll

  • Articles for Antiwar.com
  • Articles for Black Agenda Report
  • Articles for Counterpunch
  • Articles for Covert Action Magazine
  • Articles for Global Research
  • Articles for LA Progressive
  • Articles for Monthly Review online
  • Articles for NACLA
  • Articles for The Grayzone
  • Articles for The Guardian
  • Blogs for Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Blogs for Open Democracy
  • Blogs for the London Review of Books
  • Posts for Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
  • Posts in Sheerpost
  • Two Worlds on Substack

Related websites

  • Chartered Institute of Housing
  • Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Housing Rights
  • Nicaragua Solidarity Coalition
  • UK Housing Review
Housing Guardian contributor
John PerryJohn Perry lives in Masaya, Nicaragua where he works on UK housing and migration issues and writes about those and other topics covered in this blog.

Copyright © 2012-2025 Two Worlds | Privacy & Cookie Policy

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact
Search