Skip to content

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact

Two Worlds

A blog about Latin America,
from a writer in Nicaragua

Home / UK housing & migration / The government commits billions to private housing – it’s time to fund social homes instead
UK housing & migration

The government commits billions to private housing – it’s time to fund social homes instead

John Perry April 7, 2019

How much has government housing investment been cut since 2010? Headlines at the time reported that it fell by 60% and many people’s impressions are that it has since stayed at something like that level. But as the UK Housing Review has shown by looking at the detailed figures over the last four years, the reality is very different.

The 2019 edition, out this month, again shows that – far from falling – government housing investment has increased, and will reach around £70 billion in total over the period from now to 2023. Only a small part of this higher spending is due to recent government promises to extend the affordable homes programme or remove borrowing caps on local authorities. Most comes from a further boost in support for the private market and especially in help to first-time buyers. In fact, last year we reported that 79% of investment was going towards the private market and this year its share of the cake (see diagram) is exactly the same.

But first some good news for affordable investment. In addition to the affordable homes programme, which currently totals £9.1 billion, investment will increase by a further £3.42 billion if councils use their new borrowing freedom as expected. A further £2 billion will be invested in affordable homes as a result of Theresa May’s pledge at last year’s NHF conference, although this doesn’t kick in until 2022 so is really a down payment on the next phase of the programme. Together, these changes boost spending on affordable homes to almost £15 billion between now and 2023. In addition, and too late to include in the UK Housing Review, in his Spring statement the chancellor announced another £3 billion for a new phase of affordable housing guarantees.

Set against this though, a full £55 billion is earmarked over the same period to support the private market and first-time buyers. The biggest item here is Help to Buy, now extended to 2023 and due to reach £30 billion in loan funding by then. This money is recoverable after five years, but of course is at risk if house prices were to head downwards. Not recoverable though are the cash grants given to savers through the Help to Buy and Lifetime ISAs: these will add up to almost £4 billion by 2023 and will continue to pay out in later years. The government has also bolstered two of its biggest private market support measures, the Housing Infrastructure Fund and the Home Building Fund: the first is grants and the second is loans, each worth over £4 billion. Another £8 billion is set aside for private sector guarantees and it is this fund that might provide the backing for the new guarantees for affordable housing as they are not believed to involve extra money.

The huge imbalance in funding between affordable and private market housing therefore continues. It first came about when George Osborne chose to put government money directly into the housing market on an unprecedented scale, nominally to help the market out of recession. As the recession has receded however, the sums involved have not been reduced but have been ratcheted up even further. Many believe that the market is now so hooked on these various forms of subsidy that a future government will find it very difficult to cut them back.

Arguably, though, this is a challenge that must be faced. The only way to produce a step-change in output of homes at genuinely affordable rents is by increasing subsidy levels so that social landlords can build more. The argument that the public sector cannot afford extra money has a straightforward response. There is no need to increase the size of the housing investment ‘pot’, what’s needed is a more sensible sharing out of the £70 billion that is already in it.

Original post: Inside Housing

Post Tags: #council housing#housing finance#housing investment#homeownership#housing associations

Post navigation

Previous Previous
It’s time to look again at revenue support for new build
NextContinue
Nicaragua’s crisis: the struggle for balanced media coverage

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to the Two Worlds blog and we'll send you an email alert when we publish a new post. Please review our Privacy Policy if you have any questions or concerns.

Check your inbox now to confirm your subscription.

Categories

  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • Masaya project updates
  • Energy and the environment
  • Central America wildlife
  • Book reviews
  • Obituaries

Tags

allocations ALMOs Argentina borrowing rules budget butterflies census climate change Colombia community cohesion Costa Rica council housing Cuba drugs energy efficiency environment Green Deal homelessness Honduras housing housing benefit housing finance housing investment housing policy investment Latin writers Malvinas Masaya media Mexico migration migration policy migration statistics model cities Nicaragua Paraguay pension funds private rented sector rents right to buy tenancy reform tenant involvement transport US intervention welfare reform

Blogroll

  • Articles for Antiwar.com
  • Articles for Black Agenda Report
  • Articles for Counterpunch
  • Articles for Covert Action Magazine
  • Articles for Global Research
  • Articles for LA Progressive
  • Articles for Monthly Review online
  • Articles for NACLA
  • Articles for The Grayzone
  • Articles for The Guardian
  • Articles in People's Dispatch
  • Blogs for Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Blogs for Open Democracy
  • Blogs for the London Review of Books
  • Posts for Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
  • Posts in Sheerpost
  • Two Worlds on Substack

Related websites

  • Chartered Institute of Housing
  • Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Housing Rights
  • Nicaragua Solidarity Coalition
  • UK Housing Review
Housing Guardian contributor
John PerryJohn Perry lives in Masaya, Nicaragua where he writes about Latin America for the Grayzone, Covert Action, FAIR, London Review of Books, Morning Star and elsewhere, and also works on UK housing and migration issues.

Copyright © 2012-2025 Two Worlds | Privacy & Cookie Policy

  • Home
  • Latin America
  • Nicaragua
  • Honduras
  • UK housing & migration
  • About
  • Contact
Search