Two Worlds

A blog about UK housing, Latin America, migration and the environment

  • Home
  • About
  • Masaya projects
  • Housing and migration publications
  • Contact
You are here: Home > Housing > Build it and they will borrow

Build it and they will borrow

July 3, 2013

Danny Alexander’s infrastructure plan relies heavily on underwriting a vast amount of investment by overseas companies. It’s time to adopt the same borrowing rules as their governments.

Our borrowing rules are a mess. Anyone who wants proof should look at Danny Alexander’s infrastructure plans.

Last week’s plans majored on the new investments promised in two fields in particular, energy and transport.  Looking at who is responsible for the new investment shows the tangled mess that the UK’s borrowing rules create, putting our industries at a disadvantage compared with the rest of Europe.

First, the government wants more investment in nuclear power and is planning to provide guarantees of £10 billion to ‘secure the big-scale financing not available in the markets’. The centrepiece of the package is Hinkley Point C, to be developed by EDF.  But, apparently, EDF is not able to raise the money itself, so we have the irony of the government giving a guarantee to a government-owned company.  The irony arises because EDF (Électricité de France) is largely owned by the French government, not ours, and has annual sales of over 70 billion euro making it the world’s largest electricity producer.

Contrast this with the business secretary’s attitude to the Royal Mail, for the moment still owned by the British government.  He says ‘we can’t divert capital we need for schools and hospitals to Royal Mail – a very large business making substantial profits’.  So we can’t allow a British firm that is currently a public corporation to borrow money, while we can help a French one to do so.

Across in the transport industry the ironies get worse. I’ve written before about the peculiar status of Network Rail, about to receive further subsidies for various schemes despite its non-public, non-private status.  Its liabilities are now said to stand at £30 billion, in theory nothing to do with the taxpayer but inevitably underwritten by HMT given that Network Rail (like Railtrack) is too big to fail.  If it were a public corporation, not only should its borrowing be cheaper but its liabilities would be on the books, not in some mystery space outside the public accounts.

To compound these ironies, the RMT union has just published research showing that 60% of Britain’s train operators are foreign firms, mainly ones owned by the German, Belgian or French governments.  As they point out, the British government is rushing to re-privatise the east coast mainline, in a franchise operation that will very likely end up with it being run by another government-owned company, only this time not a British one.  Yet all these companies are public corporations, run according to the same EU rules on government finances.

It’s odd too that the government is now keen to make the Highways Agency a public corporation. It wants to do this to give it ‘long-term funding certainty and flexibility which will enable it to deliver capital efficiencies’.  When Danny Alexander made that announcement, was he unaware of Michael Fallon’s views on the strings that attach to a public corporation, at least when it’s the Royal Mail? Or was he setting up the roads network to be privatised later, as advocated by the Institute of Economic Affairs? If this were to happen, presumably any public subsidies for roads would then enter the same unaccountable mystery space as those received by Network Rail

The situation is a mess, and to be fair to the government its predecessor (which set up Network Rail and was criticised for its unaccountability) is just as much to blame.  However, as was very apparent from the Alexander plan, public finance is still vital, whether for nuclear power, Crossrail or HS2.

When the finance goes to a company that is effectively underwritten by the public sector, the liability is best reflected in the public finances if that company is a properly accountable public corporation.  At the same time, such corporations should have commercial freedom, as is hinted at for the Highways Agency and would be even more appropriate in the case of Royal Mail or Directly Operated Railways (who run the east coast line).

All we need to do is to adopt international rules about government borrowing – very much the rules used by the Germans, French and Belgians, in fact, whose state-owned companies we are happy to allow run our trains or provide our electricity.

Original post and comments: Public Finance 

Category: Housing | Tags: borrowing rules

« Previous Next »

Subscribe

Subscribe to the Two Worlds blog and we'll send you an email alert when we publish a new post. Please review our Privacy Policy if you have any questions or concerns.

Categories

  • Housing
  • Migration
  • Latin America
  • Masaya project updates
  • Energy and the environment
  • Central America wildlife
  • Book reviews
  • Obituaries

Tags

allocations ALMOs Amazon river Argentina armadillos asylum beds in sheds Berta Cáceres birds Bolivar borrowing rules Brazil budget butterflies caribbean census chile climate change Colombia community cohesion coronavirus Costa Rica council housing Cuba daily life destitution dictators drugs economics Ecuador El Salvador energy efficiency env environment Green Deal Guatemala Gypsies and Travellers Haiti homelessness homeownership Honduras housing housing associations housing benefit housing finance housing i housing investment housing market housing policy human rights iguanas immigration checks India inequality integration interoceanic canal investment Ireland Latin America Latin writers local authorities Malvinas Masaya media Mexico migration migration policy migration statistics mining model cities Nicaragua Nicaragua crisis Northern Ireland outsourcing panama Paraguay pension funds planning private rented sector public transport race refugees regeneration rents right to buy right to rent Scotland sloths slums solar energy Spain Spanish conquest stock transfer tenancy reform tenant involvement transport US intervention Venezuela Vista Alegre volcanoes welfare reform

Blogroll

  • Blogs for the London Review of Books
  • Articles for The Guardian
  • Blogs for Open Democracy
  • Blogs for Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • Articles for Counterpunch
  • Articles for The Grayzone

Related websites

  • Chartered Institute of Housing
  • Housing Rights
  • Leicester Masaya Link Group
  • Council on Hemispheric Affairs
  • UK Housing Review
Housing Guardian contributor

Admin

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
John Perry John Perry lives in Masaya, Nicaragua where he works on
UK housing and migration issues and writes about those
and other topics covered in this blog.
Copyright © 2012- Two Worlds. Privacy & Cookie Policy. Powered by WordPress and Hybrid.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.AgreePrivacy & Cookie Policy